Graph-Represented Computation-Intensive Task Scheduling Over Air-Ground Integrated Vehicular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates vehicular cloud (VC)-assisted task scheduling in an air-ground integrated vehicular network (AGVN), where tasks carried by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and resources of VCs are both modeled as graph structures. We consider a scenario in which resource-limited UAVs carry a set of computation-intensive graph tasks, which are offloaded to resource-abundant vehicles for processing. We formulate an optimization problem to jointly optimize the mapping between task components and vehicles, and transmission powers of UAVs, while addressing the trade-off between i) completion time of tasks, ii) energy consumption of UAVs, and iii) data exchange cost among vehicles. We show that this problem is a mixed-integer non-linear programming, and thus NP-hard. We subsequently reveal that satisfying constraints related to graph task structure requires addressing the non-trivial subgraph isomorphism problem over a dynamic vehicular topology. Accordingly, we propose a decoupling approach by segregating template searching from transmission power allocation, where atemplatedenotes a mapping between task components and vehicles. For template search, we introduce a low-complexity algorithm for isomorphic subgraphs extraction. For power allocation, we develop an algorithm using$p$-norm and convex optimization techniques. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our approach outperforms baseline methods in various network settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".