<i>Mujercitos</i>: The Profane of Mexican Citizenship
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The American sociologist Jeffrey Alexander has pointed out that the degree of membership and solidarity in the civil sphere is expressed through the deep cultural codes installed in public opinion and regulatory institutions framing the sacred and the profane of citizenship. This article shows how the sensationist press perceived and judged queer individuals, giving an account of the reasons, relationships, and institutions that founded their exclusion/inclusion during the emergence of the homosexual movement. To this aim, the present study conducts a semiotic analysis of forty-two articles published between 1976 and 1985 by the magazine Alarma! The research demonstrates the existence of a “discursive triangle of homosexual exclusion” based on male heteronormativity, criminality, and morality. It also highlights the degrading, scandalous, and profane in the Mexican civil sphere. Despite media condemnation, the homosexual protest published in Alarma! allows us to perceive signs of inclusion and reconfiguration of the homosexual subject as citizen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it