Learning Denoised and Interpretable Session Representation for Conversational Search
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conversational search supports multi-turn user-system interactions to solve complex information needs. Compared with the traditional single-turn ad-hoc search, conversational search faces a more complex search intent understanding problem because a conversational search session is much longer and contains many noisy tokens. However, existing conversational dense retrieval solutions simply fine-tune the pre-trained ad-hoc query encoder on limited conversational search data, which are hard to achieve satisfactory performance in such a complex conversational search scenario. Meanwhile, the learned latent representation also lacks interpretability that people cannot perceive how the model understands the session. To tackle the above drawbacks, we propose a sparse Lexical-based Conversational REtriever (LeCoRE), which extends the SPLADE model with two well-matched multi-level denoising methods uniformly based on knowledge distillation and external query rewrites to generate denoised and interpretable lexical session representation. Extensive experiments on four public conversational search datasets in both normal and zero-shot evaluation settings demonstrate the strong performance of LeCoRE towards more effective and interpretable conversational search.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it