MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367171803 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100203

Estimation and Analysis of Building Costs Using Artificial Intelligence Support Vector Machine

2023· article· en· W4367171803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineArtificial intelligenceEstimationComputer scienceMachine learningStructured support vector machineMachine buildingRelevance vector machineEngineeringSystems engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An essential component of the project feasibility assessment is the conceptual cost estimate.In actuality, it is carried out based on the estimator's prior expertise.However, budgeting and cost control are planned and carried out ineffectively as a result of inaccurate cost estimates.The purpose of this article is to introduce an intelligent model to improve modeling approaches accuracy throughout early phases of a project's development in the construction sector.A support vector machine model, which is computationally effective, is created to calculate the conceptual costs of building projects.To get accurate estimates, the suggested neural network model is trained using a cross-validation method.Through the research of the literature and interviews with experts, the cost estimate's influencing elements are determined.As training instances, the cost information from 40 structures is used.Two potent intelligence methods-Nonlinear Regression (NR) and Evolutionary Fuzzy Neural Interface Model (EFNIM)are offered to illustrate how well the suggested model performs.Based on the readily accessible dataset from the relevant literature in the construction business, their results are contrasted.The computational findings show that the intelligent model that is being provided outperforms the other two potent methods.During the planning and conceptual design phase, the inaccuracy is satisfied for a project's conceptual cost estimate.Case studies demonstrate how SVMs may help planners anticipate the cost of construction in an effective and precise manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it