Securing E-Governance Services Based on Two Level Classification Algorithms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the expansion of cybercrime and cyberwarfare, the necessity for cyber security has recently expanded substantially.There are several trends in cyber security, but the most important is e-governance.E-government is regarded as one of the most essential platforms for transmitting data and services over the internet that frequently contain valuable and confidential data, making them subject to threats.The majority of egovernance systems rely on public-use services.The paper proposed a framework to detect threats in internet traffic flows.This paper uses a famous dataset that was collected from internet traffic called the UNSW-NB15 dataset, which consists of 307,099 instances.The framework consists of several steps, including pre-processing, identifying a correlation between features, and selecting the best ones.Finally, different machine learning algorithms are used to distinguish the normal traffic from the malware traffic.The findings uncover that SVM achieved very high accuracy (99.16%).Additionally, in the second part, which is called multi-class and consists of two stages, in the first one the study classified the abnormal flows into nine attacks with a lower accuracy of 77.80%.In the second stage with binary classification, the dataset contained both normal and abnormal, and the accuracy improved significantly to 97.48% for SVM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it