Rethinking Densely Connected Convolutional Networks for Diagnosing Infectious Diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to its high transmissibility, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented burden on healthcare systems worldwide. X-ray imaging of the chest has emerged as a valuable and cost-effective tool for detecting and diagnosing COVID-19 patients. In this study, we developed a deep learning model using transfer learning with optimized DenseNet-169 and DenseNet-201 models for three-class classification, utilizing the Nadam optimizer. We modified the traditional DenseNet architecture and tuned the hyperparameters to improve the model’s performance. The model was evaluated on a novel dataset of 3312 X-ray images from publicly available datasets, using metrics such as accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. Our results showed impressive detection rate accuracy and recall for COVID-19 patients, with 95.98% and 96% achieved using DenseNet-169 and 96.18% and 99% using DenseNet-201. Unique layer configurations and the Nadam optimization algorithm enabled our deep learning model to achieve high rates of accuracy not only for detecting COVID-19 patients but also for identifying normal and pneumonia-affected patients. The model’s ability to detect lung problems early on, as well as its low false-positive and false-negative rates, suggest that it has the potential to serve as a reliable diagnostic tool for a variety of lung diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".