MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367727818 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3272556

Bio-Inspired Feature Selection Algorithms With Their Applications: A Systematic Literature Review

2023· article· en· W4367727818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Data Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFeature selectionMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMetaheuristicParticle swarm optimizationAlgorithmSupport vector machineFeature (linguistics)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the principles of the biological evolution of nature, bio-inspired algorithms are gaining popularity in developing robust techniques for optimization. Unlike gradient descent optimization methods, these metaheuristic algorithms are computationally less expensive, and can also considerably perform well with nonlinear and high-dimensional data. Objectives: To understand the algorithms, application domains, effectiveness, and challenges of bio-inspired feature selection techniques. Method: A systematic literature review is conducted on five major digital databases of science and engineering. Results: The primary search included 695 articles. After removing 263 duplicated articles, 432 studies remained to be screened. Among those, 317 irrelevant papers were removed. We then excluded 77 studies according to the exclusion criteria. Finally, 38 articles were selected for this study. Conclusion: Out of 38 studies, 28 papers discussed Swarm-based algorithms, 2 papers studied Genetic Algorithms, and 8 papers covered algorithms in both categories. Considering the application domains, 21 of the articles focused on problems in the healthcare sector, while the rest mainly investigated issues in cybersecurity, text classification, and image processing. Hybridization with other BIAs was employed by approximately 18.5% of papers, and 13 out of 38 studies used S-shaped transfer functions. The majority of studies used supervised classification methods such as k-NN and SVM for building fitness functions. Accordingly, we conclude that future research should focus on applying bio-inspired feature selection to a diverse area of applications such as finance and social networks. And further exploration into enhancement techniques such as quantum representation, rough set theory, chaotic maps, and Lévy flight is necessary. Additionally, we suggest investigating other transfer functions besides S-shaped, such as V-shaped and X-shaped. Moreover, clustering and deep learning models for constructing fitness functions in bio-inspired feature selection algorithms need to be investigated further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it