MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368232611 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2023.3271613

Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in Vehicular Networks: A Lyapunov-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

2023· article· en· W4368232611 on OpenAlexafffund
Anitha Saravana Kumar, Lian Zhao, Xavier Fernando

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLyapunov optimizationComputer scienceEnergy consumptionReinforcement learningServerResource allocationQueueing theoryMobile edge computingDistributed computingQueuing delayQueueEdge computingTask (project management)Computer networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEngineeringArtificial intelligenceLyapunov exponent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicular Edge Computing (VEC) has gained popularity due to its ability to enhance vehicular networks. VEC servers located at Roadside Units (RSUs) allow low-power vehicles to offload computation-intensive and delay-sensitive applications, making it a promising solution. However, optimal resource allocation between edge servers is a complex issue due to vehicle mobility and dynamic data traffic. To address this issue, we propose a Lyapunov-based Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (L-MADDPG) method that jointly optimizes computing task distribution and radio resource allocation to minimize energy consumption and delay requirements. We evaluate the trade-offs between the performance of the optimization algorithm, queuing model, and energy consumption. We first examine delay, queue and energy models for task execution at the vehicle or RSU, followed by the L-MADDPG algorithm for jointly optimizing task offloading and resource allocation problems to reduce energy consumption without compromising performance. Our simulation results show that our algorithm can reduce energy consumption while maintaining system performance compared to existing algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207