MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synchrophasor Big Data Architectures, Platforms and Applications: A Review

2022· review· en· W4372056130 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataElectric power systemComputer scienceSystems engineeringData scienceEngineeringPower (physics)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world is moving towards an era of data driven analytics and decision making. Concurrently, the electrical power industry is moving towards a data driven analytical environment from a model driven analytical environment. Electrical power industry utilizes different types of data. Synchrophasor data is one of the main data types associated with many of the power system applications. However, with the expansion of Phasor Measurement Units (PMU) networks, the synchrophasor data is becoming a Big Data (BD) issue. Therefore, many researchers have drawn their attention on synchrophasor big data handling and utilization. This paper briefly discusses power system BD architectures and standard architectures available in real-world applications. The goals of this paper are to make a review of existing BD architectures and commercially available platforms for synchrophasor applications; to do a comparative analysis of existing BD architectures; and to do a review of the existing applications and the compatibility these applications with the existing BD platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it