MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Efficient COVID-19 Mortality Risk Prediction Model Using Deep Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and Convolution Neural Networks

2023· article· en· W4372286023 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioMedInformatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceOversamplingDeep learningComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkMachine learningAutoencoderArtificial neural networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 virus has made a huge impact on people’s lives ever since the outbreak happened in December 2019. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 virus has not completely vanished from the world yet, and thus, global agitation is still increasing with mutations and variants of the same. Early diagnosis is the best way to decline the mortality risk associated with it. This urges the necessity of developing new computational approaches that can analyze a large dataset and predict the disease in time. Currently, automated virus diagnosis is a major area of research for accurate and timely predictions. Artificial intelligent (AI)-based techniques such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) can be deployed for this purpose. In this, compared to traditional machine learning techniques, deep Learning approaches show prominent results. Yet it still requires optimization in terms of complex space problems. To address this issue, the proposed method combines deep learning predictive models such as convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), auto-encoder (AE), cross-validation (CV), and synthetic minority oversampling techniques (SMOTE). This method proposes six different combinations of deep learning forecasting models such as CV-CNN, CV-LSTM+CNN, IMG-CNN, AE+CV-CNN, SMOTE-CV-LSTM, and SMOTE-CV-CNN. The performance of each model is evaluated using various metrics on the standard dataset that is approved by The Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. The experimental results show that the SMOTE-CV-CNN model outperforms the other models by achieving an accuracy of 98.29%. Moreover, the proposed SMOTE-CV-CNN model has been compared to existing mortality risk prediction methods based on both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), and has demonstrated superior accuracy. Based on the experimental analysis, it can be inferred that the proposed SMOTE-CV-CNN model has the ability to effectively predict mortality related to COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it