MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Efficient COVID-19 Mortality Risk Prediction Model Using Deep Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and Convolution Neural Networks

2023· article· en· W4372286023 on OpenAlexaff
Rajkumar Soundrapandiyan, Adhiyaman Manickam, Moulay A. Akhloufi, Y. V. Srinivasa Murthy, R. Sundaram, Sivasubramanian Thirugnanasambandam

Bibliographic record

VenueBioMedInformatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceOversamplingDeep learningComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkMachine learningAutoencoderArtificial neural networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 virus has made a huge impact on people’s lives ever since the outbreak happened in December 2019. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 virus has not completely vanished from the world yet, and thus, global agitation is still increasing with mutations and variants of the same. Early diagnosis is the best way to decline the mortality risk associated with it. This urges the necessity of developing new computational approaches that can analyze a large dataset and predict the disease in time. Currently, automated virus diagnosis is a major area of research for accurate and timely predictions. Artificial intelligent (AI)-based techniques such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) can be deployed for this purpose. In this, compared to traditional machine learning techniques, deep Learning approaches show prominent results. Yet it still requires optimization in terms of complex space problems. To address this issue, the proposed method combines deep learning predictive models such as convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), auto-encoder (AE), cross-validation (CV), and synthetic minority oversampling techniques (SMOTE). This method proposes six different combinations of deep learning forecasting models such as CV-CNN, CV-LSTM+CNN, IMG-CNN, AE+CV-CNN, SMOTE-CV-LSTM, and SMOTE-CV-CNN. The performance of each model is evaluated using various metrics on the standard dataset that is approved by The Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. The experimental results show that the SMOTE-CV-CNN model outperforms the other models by achieving an accuracy of 98.29%. Moreover, the proposed SMOTE-CV-CNN model has been compared to existing mortality risk prediction methods based on both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), and has demonstrated superior accuracy. Based on the experimental analysis, it can be inferred that the proposed SMOTE-CV-CNN model has the ability to effectively predict mortality related to COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioMedInformaticsSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207