MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372337975 · doi:10.1016/j.idm.2023.04.008

A discrete-time susceptible-infectious-recovered-susceptible model for the analysis of influenza data

2023· article· en· W4372337975 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Georges Bucyibaruta, C. B. Dean, Mahmoud Torabi

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Disease Modelling · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCanadian Statistical Sciences InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPoisson distributionDisease transmissionBayesian probabilityTransmission (telecommunications)StatisticsBayesian inferenceInfectious disease (medical specialty)InferenceBiologyDiscrete time and continuous timeExtinction (optical mineralogy)Epidemic modelEconometricsDiseaseDemographyVirologyMathematicsMedicineComputer sciencePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a discrete time compartmental model to describe the spread of seasonal influenza virus. As time and disease state variables are assumed to be discrete, this model is considered to be a discrete time, stochastic, Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered-Susceptible (DT-SIRS) model, where weekly counts of disease are assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. We allow the disease transmission rate to also vary over time, and the disease can only be reintroduced after extinction if there is a contact with infected individuals from other host populations. To capture the variability of influenza activities from one season to the next, we define the seasonality with a 4-week period effect that may change over years. We examine three different transmission rates and compare their performance to that of existing approaches. Even though there is limited information for susceptible and recovered individuals, we demonstrate that the simple models for transmission rates effectively capture the behaviour of the disease dynamics. We use a Bayesian approach for inference. The framework is applied in an analysis of the temporal spread of influenza in the province of Manitoba, Canada, 2012-2015.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfectious Disease ModellingSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207