PPOLQ: Privacy-Preserving Optimal Location Query With Multiple-Condition Filter in Outsourced Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optimal location selection is one type of the location-based services (LBS) that aims to find the best location for a new facility from some candidate facilities given a set of existing facilities and a set of customers. Due to reliable and flexible cloud services, outsourcing such heavy-computation tasks has been a popular trend. However, since the cloud is not fully trusted, and the location data contains the sensitive information, privacy protection becomes an essential requirement for these services. Although some related works have been proposed to provide privacy protection, the privacy of data and queries, accuracy of query results, and multiple features of location data are not considered by them simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a privacy-preserving optimal location query scheme PPOLQ that supports multiple-condition filter and queries over multiple data providers in outsourced environments. Specifically, we first design a secure division protocol and a secure inner product protocol based on the Paillier algorithm and the random masking technique, respectively. After that, based on the proposed algorithms, the additive homomorphic encryption, and the secure two-party computation techniques, we develop a privacy-preserving optimal location query scheme. Finally, we analyze the security of our proposed algorithms and scheme in the semi-honest model. Meanwhile, we implement all algorithms and the proposed scheme, and our implementation is open source at Gitee. We also evaluate their performances using synthetic datasets, and extensive experiments show that our scheme is practical for the real-world applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".