MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375858784 · doi:10.32473/flairs.36.133365

Towards binary encoding in Bidirectional Associative Memories

2023· article· en· W4375858784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncoding (memory)Computer scienceAssociative propertyBinary numberCognitionBidirectional associative memoryTask (project management)RecallArtificial intelligenceContent-addressable memoryTransmission (telecommunications)Function (biology)Artificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Cognitive psychologyPsychologyNeuroscienceArithmeticMathematicsBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bidirectional Associative Memories (BAMs) are Artificial Neural Networks frequently utilized in cognitive modeling. While bipolar encoding is commonly used in BAMs for optimal performance, binary encoding presents interesting properties. As such, this study introduces a novel transmission function for binary encoding and compares its performance to the conventional bipolar transmission function. To evaluate, an auto-association learning task and a noisy recall task were implemented. Results revealed that despite longer learning times, binary encoding preserves or enhances the properties observed in binary encoding. Findings are promising from a cognitive perspective, as they open the possibility of building intricate models of human cognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it