Exploring the Potential of Cyber Manufacturing System in the Digital Age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyber-manufacturing Systems (CMS) have been growing in popularity, transitioning from conventional manufacturing to an innovative paradigm that emphasizes innovation, automation, better customer service, and intelligent systems. A new manufacturing model can improve efficiency and productivity, and provide better customer service and response times. In addition, it may revolutionize the way products are produced, from design to completion. Therefore, it is likely that this new manufacturing model will become increasingly popular. By building new technologies on top of existing CMS, these systems will ensure that data exchange and integration between decentralized systems are reliable and secure. Recently published case studies from industry and the literature support this claim; some challenges remain to be overcome. In general, the use of CMS can revolutionize the manufacturing industry. This study comprehensively analyzes these systems and their potential applications and implications. An overview of the field is then given and various aspects of CMS are also explored with more details. A taxonomy of the most common and current approaches to CMS is presented, including networked cyber-manufacturing systems, distributed cyber-manufacturing systems, cloud-based cyber-manufacturing systems, and cyber-physical systems (CPS). Furthermore, our survey identifies several popular open-source software and datasets and discusses how these resources can reduce barriers to CMS research. In addition, we identify several important issues and research opportunities associated with CMS, including better integration between hardware and software, improved security and privacy protocols, communication protocols, and improved data management systems. In summary, this paper presents a comprehensive overview of current technology and valuable insights are provided for the potential impact of CMS on society and industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".