MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376128502 · doi:10.1080/07373937.2023.2209635

Predicting unit energy consumption during industrial veneer drying via data-driven approaches

2023· article· en· W4376128502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMitacs
KeywordsVeneerElectricityEnergy consumptionWork (physics)Unit (ring theory)Consumption (sociology)Environmental economicsComputer scienceBusinessOperations managementOperations researchEnvironmental scienceEconomicsEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Veneer drying usually consumes a significant amount of energy including heat and electricity. The soaring energy price as well as the substantial social-environmental concerns regarding energy use have urged veneer manufacturers to adapt and become more efficient in energy consumption. Different from the physics-based methods commonly seen in the literature, this research embraced a data-driven approach to analyze and predict unit gas and electricity consumption during industrial veneer drying. Both linear regression and random forest (RF) algorithms were deployed for prediction. Based on cross-validation evaluations, the RF model with all explanatory variables slightly outperformed two linear models regarding almost all accuracy metrics, although linear models had the advantage of providing an easy-to-interpret solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it