MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376223865 · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7219a4

<i>Notes from the Field:</i> First Reported U.S. Cases of Tinea Caused by <i>Trichophyton indotineae —</i> New York City, December 2021–March 2023

2023· article· en· W4376223865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTrichophytonDermatologyTinea capitisFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tinea is a common, highly contagious, superficial infection of the skin, hair, or nails caused by dermatophyte molds.*During the past decade, an epidemic of severe, antifungalresistant tinea has emerged in South Asia because of the rapid spread of Trichophyton indotineae, † a novel dermatophyte species; the epidemic has likely been driven by misuse and overuse of topical antifungals and corticosteroids § (1,2).T. indotineae infections are highly transmissible and characterized by widespread, inflamed, pruritic plaques on the body (tinea corporis), the crural fold, pubic region, and adjacent thigh (tinea cruris), or the face (tinea faciei) (1).T. indotineae isolates are frequently resistant to terbinafine, a mainstay of tinea treatment (1,3).T. indotineae infections have been reported throughout Asia and in Europe and Canada but have not previously been described in the United States (3).On February 28, 2023, a New York City dermatologist notified public health officials of two patients who had severe tinea that did not improve with oral terbinafine treatment, raising concern for potential T. indotineae infection; these patients shared no epidemiologic links.Skin culture isolates from each patient were previously identified by a clinical laboratory as Trichophyton mentagrophytes and were subsequently forwarded to the Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, * Commonly known as "ringworm," tinea is most often caused by dermatophyte molds belonging to the genus Trichophyton.The infection spreads easily by skin-to-skin contact with infected animals or persons, secondary spread from other affected body sites, and fomites.Most skin infections are localized and resolve with topical antifungal treatment, and oral antifungal therapy is generally reserved for cases that do not improve with topical treatment or those with extensive disease or infection of the hair follicles.https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/ringworm/definition.html† The etiologic agent causing the epidemic of drug-resistant tinea in South Asia was initially identified as T. mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII.However, based on recent genomic studies, scientists determined that these frequently terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton strains were sufficiently different from T. mentagrophytes to be considered a new species, T. indotineae.§ The emergence and spread of T. indotineae in South Asian countries have been linked to the inappropriate use of widely available topical combination creams containing antifungals, antibiotics, and high-potency corticosteroids.https:// www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/ringworm/dermatophyte-resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it