MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376288765 · doi:10.1075/sibil.64.15cra

The effects of bilingualism on cognitive functioning in olderadults

2023· book-chapter· en· W4376288765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in bilingualism · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscience of multilingualismPsychologyCognitionExecutive functionsWorking memoryDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyControl (management)Action (physics)NeuroscienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter examines the links between bilingualism and executive control in older adults, with a particular focus on comparing those with lifelong bilingual experience to those who do not. While aging is a maturational process in which people become suboptimal in executive control, there is observable and documented variability associated with language experiences. The chapter reviews the literature on cognitive aging as a maturational process, and its interaction with bilingualism as a life experience. Although it should be acknowledged that there is mixed evidence, a body of literature on bilingualism and cognitive control has suggested that there is an advantage for bilingual older adults in some executive functions, such as monitoring, maintaining action goals, and possibly in working memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it