Two-Unitary Decomposition Algorithm and Open Quantum System Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulating general quantum processes that describe realistic interactions of quantum systems following a non-unitary evolution is challenging for conventional quantum computers that directly implement unitary gates. We analyze complexities for promising methods such as the Sz.-Nagy dilation and linear combination of unitaries that can simulate open systems by the probabilistic realization of non-unitary operators, requiring multiple calls to both the encoding and state preparation oracles. We propose a quantum two-unitary decomposition (TUD) algorithm to decompose a d -dimensional operator A with non-zero singular values as A=(U1+U2)/2 using the quantum singular value transformation algorithm, avoiding classically expensive singular value decomposition (SVD) with an O(d3) overhead in time. The two unitaries can be deterministically implemented, thus requiring only a single call to the state preparation oracle for each. The calls to the encoding oracle can also be reduced significantly at the expense of an acceptable error in measurements. Since the TUD method can be used to implement non-unitary operators as only two unitaries, it also has potential applications in linear algebra and quantum machine learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".