Metabolomics of infectious diseases in the era of personalized medicine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infectious diseases continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Diseases cause perturbation of the host’s immune system provoking a response that involves genes, proteins and metabolites. While genes are regulated by epigenetic or other host factors, proteins can undergo post-translational modification to enable/modify function. As a result, it is difficult to correlate the disease phenotype based solely on genetic and proteomic information only. Metabolites, however, can provide direct information on the biochemical activity during diseased state. Therefore, metabolites may, potentially, represent a phenotypic signature of a diseased state. Measuring and assessing metabolites in large scale falls under the omics technology known as “metabolomics”. Comprehensive and/or specific metabolic profiling in biological fluids can be used as biomarkers of disease diagnosis. In addition, metabolomics together with genomics can be used to differentiate patients with differential treatment response and development of host targeted therapy instead of pathogen targeted therapy where pathogens are more prone to mutation and lead to antimicrobial resistance. Thus, metabolomics can be used for patient stratification, personalized drug formulation and disease control and management. Currently, several therapeutics and in vitro diagnostics kits have been approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for personalized treatment and diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, the actual number of therapeutics or diagnostics kits required for tailored treatment is limited as metabolomics and personalized medicine require the involvement of personnel from multidisciplinary fields ranging from technological development, bioscience, bioinformatics, biostatistics, clinicians, and biotechnology companies. Given the significance of metabolomics, in this review, we discussed different aspects of metabolomics particularly potentials of metabolomics as diagnostic biomarkers and use of small molecules for host targeted treatment for infectious diseases, and their scopes and challenges in personalized medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".