XTS: A Hybrid Framework to Detect DNS-Over-HTTPS Tunnels Based on XGBoost and Cooperative Game Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a hybrid approach called XTS that uses a combination of techniques to analyze highly imbalanced data with minimum features. XTS combines cost-sensitive XGBoost, a game theory-based model explainer called TreeSHAP, and a newly developed algorithm known as Sequential Forward Evaluation algorithm (SFE). The general aim of XTS is to reduce the number of features required to learn a particular dataset. It assumes that low-dimensional representation of data can improve computational efficiency and model interpretability whilst retaining a strong prediction performance. The efficiency of XTS was tested on a public dataset, and the results showed that by reducing the number of features from 33 to less than five, the proposed model achieved over 99.9% prediction efficiency. XTS was also found to outperform other benchmarked models and existing proof-of-concept solutions in the literature. The dataset contained data related to DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) tunnels. The top predictors for DoH classification and characterization were identified using interactive SHAP plots, which included destination IP, packet length mode, and source IP. XTS offered a promising approach to improve the efficiency of the detection and analysis of DoH tunnels while maintaining accuracy, which can have important implications for behavioral network intrusion detection systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".