MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377832615 · doi:10.18280/ts.400238

GCNE: Graph Convolution Networks with Explicitly Influence for Recommendation

2023· article· en· W4377832615 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphConvolution (computer science)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph Convolution Network (GCN) has become increasingly important for collaborative filtering with the modeling of user-item interaction graphs through embedding propagation.Existing work that can adapts GCN to well capture accurate user preference, which highly rely on learned representations with sufficient and high-quality training data.However, the neighborhood aggregation scheme in GCN enlarges the impact of interactions on representation learning, making the learning more vulnerable to interaction noises, since the user-item interaction graph is also modeled by same neural operations that may be unnecessary.In this paper, we propose to integrate the explicitly feedback (i.e., user-item ratings) representation of user-item interactions into the embedding process to enhance recommendation performance.We develop a novel Graph Convolution Network framework with Explicitly feedback (GCNE), which augments user-item representations by explicitly exploiting the user-item ratings feedback among entities in the predictive model, which better alleviates the interaction noises problem and data sparsity.Specifically, we introduce a adjacency matrix by regarding user behaviors and item ratings feedback as two bipartite graphs, such module could explicitly explore the propagation process of user interest and feedback influence, so as to enhance the robustness of recommendation systems.Extensive experiments demonstrate that GCNE can significantly improve the performance over various state-of-the-art baselines.Further analysis verifies the superior representation ability of our GCNE recommendation framework in alleviating the data sparsity and noise issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it