MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378216680 · doi:10.1177/14759217231176050

Deep learning-based bridge damage identification approach inspired by internal force redistribution effects

2023· article· en· W4378216680 on OpenAlexaff
Kang Yang, Youliang Ding, Huachen Jiang, Yun Zhang, Zhengbo Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Health Monitoring · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInterpretabilityComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceStiffnessStructural health monitoringClassifier (UML)Machine learningEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Damage identification has always been one of the core functions of bridge structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. Damage identification techniques based on deep learning (DL) approaches have shown great promise recently. However, DL methods still need to be improved owing to their poor interpretability and generalization performance. The fundamental reason lies in the separation between physics-based mechanical principles and data-driven DL methods. To address this issue, this paper proposes a physics-inspired approach combining the data-driven method and the internal force redistribution effects to perform efficient damage identification. Firstly, the mechanical derivation of internal force redistribution is given based on a simplified three-span continuous bridge. Then, two types of typical damage scenarios including segment stiffness decrease and prestress loss are simulated to formulate the damage dataset with monitored field data noise added. Next, a modified Transformer model with multi-dimensional output is trained to obtain the complex dynamic spatiotemporal mapping among multiple measurement points from the intact structure as a benchmark model. Finally, the relationship between multiple damage patterns and the corresponding output regression residual distribution is studied, based on which the flexible combinations of the sensors are proposed as the test set to characterize the internal force redistribution due to damage. Validation on the extended dataset showed that this approach is effective to realize preliminary identification of damage patterns and resist interference from noise at the monitoring site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural Health MonitoringSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207