Understanding the Influence of Surface Acid and Base Properties and Water on Work Functions and Triboelectric Charging Using Inverse Gas Chromatography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) has been applied to study surface Lewis acid and base properties of xerographic developers. Model carrier and toners were prepared and the toners blended with metal oxide surface additives: silica, titania and alumina. The effect of additives on charging, work functions and surface chemistry, as measured by IGC, was studied. All properties were evaluated as a function of relative humidity, to improve understanding of the effect of water as relative humidity increases. Results under dry and wet conditions generally support a work function model for charging, where work functions are determined by surface acid-base properties. Adsorption of water onto surfaces can be followed by IGC, work functions and charging. All provide a consistent picture that water adsorption leads to surfaces that have essentially the properties of adsorbed water at sufficiently high RH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it