MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378808185 · doi:10.3390/math11112514

Graphical Local Genetic Algorithm for High-Dimensional Log-Linear Models

2023· article· en· W4378808185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraphical modelCrossoverAlgorithmComputationHill climbingComputer scienceMathematicsDimension (graph theory)Genetic algorithmMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graphical log-linear models are effective for representing complex structures that emerge from high-dimensional data. It is challenging to fit an appropriate model in the high-dimensional setting and many existing methods rely on a convenient class of models, called decomposable models, which lend well to a stepwise approach. However, these methods restrict the pool of candidate models from which they can search, and these methods are difficult to scale. It can be shown that a non-decomposable model can be approximated by the decomposable model which is its minimal triangulation, thus extending the convenient computational properties of decomposable models to any model. In this paper, we propose a local genetic algorithm with a crossover-hill-climbing operator, adapted for log-linear graphical models. We show that the graphical local genetic algorithm can be used successfully to fit non-decomposable models for both a low number of variables and a high number of variables. We use the posterior probability as a measure of fitness and parallel computing to decrease the computation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it