MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development, Validation and Approbation Analytical Method for the Quantitative Determination of Taurine by HPLC-UV Method in the Test of Comparative Dissolution Kinetics

2023· article· en· W4379276540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug development & registration · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Public Health Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaurineChromatographyChemistryDissolutionDerivatizationKineticsHigh-performance liquid chromatographyDosage formAmino acidBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Taurine is a non-proteinogenic amino acid. The molecule is involved in lipid metabolism, adsorbs fat-soluble vitamins, and its conjugates with bile acids contribute to the emulsification of fats in the intestine. Drugs, which include a taurine molecule, have anti-cataract, cardiotonic, metabolic effects, and also stimulate regeneration. Among the dosage forms, where taurine acts as an active substance, there is a solid dosage form – film-coated tablets. One of the methods for assessing the quality of solid dosage forms is a comparative dissolution kinetics test. High-performance chromatography with ultraviolet detection is a widely used method for quantification within the dissolution test, however, for taurine, which does not contain chromophore groups in its structure, this method is not directly applicable. To solve this problem, one can apply the method of pre-column derivatization, because of which an fragment is introduced into the structure, providing a bathochromic shift in the UV spectrum of the starting compound. Aim. Development, validation and approbation analytical method for the quantitative determination of taurine by high-performance chromatography with ultraviolet detection as part of a test comparative kinetics dissolution of taurine tablets with a dosage of 250 and 500 mg. Materials and methods. The following preparations were used for the analysis: taurine tablets, film-coated 250 mg and 500 mg, domestic production with a valid expiration date. The comparative dissolution kinetics test was carried out on a DT 126 Light instrument for the "Dissolution" test (ERWEKA GmbH, Germany). Chromatographic separation and detection were performed on a Nexera-i LC-2040 high-performance liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) equipped with a column and sample thermostat, a degasser, an autosampler, and an ultraviolet detector. Detection was carried out at a wavelength of 254 nm after derivatization of the taurine molecule with 4-toluenesulfonyl chloride. Were used a Shim-pack Velox C18 5 μm 4.6 × 150 mm column (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) and a Shim-pack Velox C18 EXP Guard Column Cartridge 5 μm 4.6 × 5 mm (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Primary data were processed using LabSolutions Single LC software (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Results and discussion. The optimal conditions for taurine derivatization have been selected, and a method for the quantitative determination of taurine by HPLC-UV in test comparative kinetics dissolution in three dissolution media: 0.1M hydrochloric acid solution with pH 1.2, acetate buffer solution with pH 4.5, phosphate buffer solution with pH 6.8, as well as in the quality control medium – purified water has been developed and validated. During the validation of the developed methodology, it was found that the validation characteristics are within the acceptance criteria in 4 dissolution media. The analytical range of the method was 0.05–1.2 mg/mL and allows the developed method to be used for the quantitative determination of tablets with a dosage of 250 mg and 500 mg as part of the test comparative kinetics dissolution. The method was tested in 4 dissolution media, in all media, there was a complete release in both dosages (more than 85 % by 30 minutes). Conclusion. The method was tested in three dissolution media: 0.1 M hydrochloric acid solution with pH 1.2, acetate buffer solution with pH 4.5, phosphate buffer solution with pH 6.8, as well as in the quality control medium – purified water. In all media, there was a complete release in both dosages (more than 85 % by 30 minutes).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it