Robotic Object Perception Based on Multispectral Few-Shot Coupled Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to enable intelligent robots to recognize unknown objects as accurately as human beings, object perception research is of great significance in service and industrial robot application scenarios. However, object perception using spectral measurements under few-shot learning usually leads to a poor result because of inadequate training samples. To overcome this problem, this work proposes a novel few-shot learning with coupled dictionary learning (FSL-CDL) framework. First, a hybrid feature fusion method is developed to extract the multiple dimension-reduced features of original spectral measurements to build the hybrid features. Then, based on the hybrid features, a multitask coupled learning method is developed to effectively recognize unknown objects under few-shot learning. In this method, two coupling patterns, i.e., interspectroscopy coupling and intraspectroscopy coupling, effectively bridge the gap between two spectral measurements. Finally, the proposed FSL-CDL is compared with other advanced algorithms on the SMM50 dataset, and reaches 97.5% and 98.4% recognition accuracy under one-shot and five-shot learning, respectively, which are better than other algorithms. Besides, FSL-CDL can be extended to other perception tasks which contains multiple heterogeneous measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".