MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379623553 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2004.a826845

Le riviste di italianistica nel mondo: Atti del Convegno internazionale. Napoli 23-25 Novembre 2000 by Marco Santoro (review)

2004· article· it· W4379623553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldComputer Science
TopicLinguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPoliticsThe RenaissanceArtArt historyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLR, 99.4, 2004 1067 Le riviste di italianistica nel mondo: Atti del Convegno internazionale. Napoli 23-25 Novembre 2000. Ed. by Marco Santoro. (Quaderni di 'Esperienze Letterarie', 3) Rome and Pisa: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali. 2002. xvii + 384 pp. ?93. ISBN88-8147-252-X. This volume, which collects the proceedings of the 2000 Naples conference on present-day periodicals devoted to Italian studies, offersa wealth ofinformation about this discipline, reaching well beyond what might appear to be the narrow confines of the topic. Some papers concentrate on single journals, others on journals covering particular areas (e.g. comparative studies, Renaissance studies), others on single coun? tries or groups of countries, and there are also the reports of two well-documented round tables devoted to the problems of bibliographical norms and information, and of reviews. There is much of historical interest, starting from accounts of the origins of early periodicals, such as the Giornale storico della letteratura italiana (founded 1883) and the Rassegna della letteratura italiana (founded 1893), which were to take different political stances during Fascism, the firstunder Vittorio Cian, sympathetic towards the regime, the second under Achille Pellizzari, opposed to it (to the point, as Branca notes in the opening of his piece on Lettere italiane, of even breaking the law by omitting the date of the Fascist era from the Rassegna). The pieces on non-Italian periodicals give us particularly valuable accounts of the origins of university teaching of Italian, e.g. in France, Spain, Australia, and Argentina (here there is also mention of the input of Jewish refugees from Italy?one only has to recall the linguist Benvenuto Terracini). With respect to Bulgaria there is reference to Italian studies suffering a setback through the perception of Italy as 'patria del fascismo': even at the present time the country has no periodical devoted to Italian. In the discussion of the UK by Zyg Baranski we get a telling account of the British government policies damaging to the Italianist discipline, and as for Italy, several contributors deplore the effectsofthe 'reforms' on the study of Italian litera? ture. But apart from limited worries, connected also with the prevalence of Novecento studies (especially outside Italy), there is optimism and various periodicals put for? ward their future plans, such as Studi secenteschi's programme to encourage the study of historical writing and of Seicento Latin poetry, and there is confidence enough to found new highly specialized journals such as Albertiana (1998). Some of the founders discuss their own periodicals. Vittore Branca has been as? sociated with Lettere italiane since 1953; Cesare Segre was one of the founders of Strumenti critici (1966), Enzo Noe Girardi of Testo (1980), Baranski of The Italian? ist (1981), and Maria Corti of Autografo (1984). These editors explain the motives for founding their periodicals, corresponding either to their own views of literary discussions (Girardi), or to the documentation of new collections?thePavia Fondo Manoscritti (Corti)?or to the progress of the discipline (Baranski), or to freshcritical theories (Segre). In other cases important figures,connected with differentmoments of a journal or cultural activity, are evoked by their successors: Pellizzari for the Rassegna, Renzo Negri forItalianistica, and Gherardo Marone in Argentina, respon? sible, among other initiatives, for founding the national society for Dante studies. Among the aims of the periodicals we are given not only the coverage of certain areas and the particular critical line, but the readership as well: Lettere italiane and Itali? anistica, for instance, aim also to reach schoolteachers, and as to contributors, Studi italianiand Linguisticae letteratura, among others, tryto encourage recent graduates. Some ofthe Italian journals have regional affiliations,being the product of specific universities, such as Critica letteraria, linked to Naples and centred on a NaplesRome axis, and Moderna, linked to Siena. More focused on regional problems are some ofthe dedicated journals, such as Incontri meridionali and Quaderni del mezzo- 1068 Reviews giorno, and ones produced furtherafield, such as the Canadian L'arvista dl'academia, concentrating mainly on Piedmontese linguistics through the medium of the dialect. In Canada too, as well as in the United States, apart from the rich selection of more traditional periodicals, we have those devoted to Italo-Canadian and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it