Bibliographic record
Abstract
MLR, 96. , 200I MLR, 96. , 200I is felt throughout the study. The occasional allusions to Kristeva, Irigaray and Cixous, on the need for women to reclaim the female body from the male gaze (visualappropriation),become clearand strongin thisfinalchapter,althoughthisis by no means a feministtract.Through a detailedtextualstudyof the storiesofJoyce Carol Oates (USA), Rosario Ferre(PuertoRico), Clara Sim6 (Catalonia),Brianda Domecq (Mexico) and the black American writer Ana Petry, the critic concludes this almost encyclopedic work with a resume of female treatment of the theme, as compared to the male subjective manipulation of the female subject/object, a rejection of the traditionalusurpation of the feminine phenomenon. If these final remarksof Rueda's sound a little strident,they are not typical or characteristicof the restof the study,hence the aforementionedneed fora more balancedconclusion which would have given her an opportunity to tie up the many threads of her narrative fabric. This is an interesting study, comprehensive in its coverage, profound in its analysis,delightfulto read. It is undoubtedlyan authoratitive,if not the definitive, study on the Greek legend, proof positive that myths do have universalapplication. QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY, ONTARIO JOHN WALKER Theheterotextual bodyof theMoraMorilla. By LOUIsE O. VASVARI.(Papers of the Medieval Hispanic Research Seminar, I2). London: Queen Mary and WestfieldCollege. I999. II5 PP. 9; $14.50; 2,100 ptas. Literatura cetrera dela edadmediayelrenacimiento espanol.ByJosE MANUELFRADREJAS RUEDA. (Papersof the Medieval Hispanic Research Seminar, I3). London: Queen Mary and Westfield College. I999. 91 pp. ?8; $12.50; 1,900 ptas. The Papers of the Medieval Hispanic Research Seminar of Queen Mary and Westfield College continue with two volumes which, if nothing else, demonstrate the wide range of material and theoretical approaches currently deployed in hispano-medievalism. Louise O. Vasvari'sbook, although ostensibly dealing with the 'Yom'era mora moraima' ballad, is in fact much more. Using the motif of the 'mora' opening the door as a starting point, she explores the semiotic system of ballads with particular reference to the erotic. Vasvari provides a significant theoretical introduction to the questions she raises, seeking support in her reinterpretativequest from, amongst others, Freudand Bakhtin.The analysisis not, however, impenetrable.Vasvaritakesthe readerthrougha range of contexts, and is able to quote from a wide varietyof balladtraditionsin supportof her arguments.It is noticeable that this includes non-Western European examples, generally in the form of Hungarian ballads. The author examines in detail a wide range of motifs, from keysto clothes, and passesthrough, as it were, the semi-open (orclosed) door. Her insistenceon context is due to her view of the function of the ballad'snarrative structure as a 'framework to suggest emotional experience rather than [the development of] the details of a coherent story line' (p. 7). It is from this which springthe argumentsleading to her 'suspicionof the claim of reticent victimhood' (p. 58), and her well-supportedcontentions will no doubt give rise to much further analysis in similar vein. Jose Manuel Fradrejas'sbook is a horse of a considerablydifferentcolour. As the extensive bibliography implies, FradrejasRueda is already the leading author on the topic, and this production, presumably designed to give the non-specialist a mode of access to medieval Hispanic falconry literature, is a catalogue of the principal works in the field. The texts concerned are examined in chronological is felt throughout the study. The occasional allusions to Kristeva, Irigaray and Cixous, on the need for women to reclaim the female body from the male gaze (visualappropriation),become clearand strongin thisfinalchapter,althoughthisis by no means a feministtract.Through a detailedtextualstudyof the storiesofJoyce Carol Oates (USA), Rosario Ferre(PuertoRico), Clara Sim6 (Catalonia),Brianda Domecq (Mexico) and the black American writer Ana Petry, the critic concludes this almost encyclopedic work with a resume of female treatment of the theme, as compared to the male subjective manipulation of the female subject/object, a rejection of the traditionalusurpation of the feminine phenomenon. If these final remarksof Rueda's sound a little strident,they are not typical or characteristicof the restof the study,hence the aforementionedneed fora more balancedconclusion which would have given her an opportunity to tie up the many threads of her narrative fabric. This is an interesting study, comprehensive in its coverage, profound in its analysis,delightfulto read...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".