MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379624549 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2003.a827254

‘La España Moderna’ and ‘Regeneración’: A Cultural Review in Restoration Spain, 1889–1914 by Rhian Davies (review)

2003· review· es· W4379624549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2003
Typereview
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Philosophy and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteratureArtHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLRy 98.4, 2003 1015 Chapter 2 considers how Spanish novelists used 'scientific spokespersons' to incorporate scientific ideas into their texts, making science enter novels in the form of characters. The man of science is frequently not the man of clear reason, and pedants and pseudo-scientistsfrom a variety of texts by Galdos and Pardo Bazan are included. The main emphasis in this chapter, however, is on Frigilis in La Regenta, read as a positive rather than a negative figure, although one whose science?at least in its ef? fects?is decoration and adornment, his effortsending only in changes of appearance. Up to this point the reader will have felt him- or herself in relatively familiar territory,although the background detail about some of the scientific ideas alluded to in these novels is given grounding in works of science proper in Spain, rather than remaining solely within the literary field. In Chapters 3 and 4, however, we enter a new territory,with a discussion of writings little known in the canon. Chap? ter 3 considers short stories by the Nobel Prize-winning histologist Ramon y Cajal (signed Doctor Bacteria), and La fe by Palacio Valdes, while in Chapter 4 there is an examination of writings that popularized science, using Ramon y Cajal's works of scientific popularization and Pardo Bazan's essay 'La ciencia amena'. Cajal turns out to be a natural popularizer, and, like various of his scientific contemporaries, ready to turn to literature to further the cause of science and spread the word. This activity is vital in turn-of-the-century Spain, and Cajal writing Los tonicos de la voluntad performs a double action of sounding an alarm about lack of science in Spain while communicating in a lively manner his own enthusiasm for scientific pursuits. Chapter 5 concentrates upon the generation of '98, with special reference to Unamuno , Amor y pedagogia, Baroja, El drbol de la ciencia, and Amor y ciencia, a play by Galdos of 1905. Rather than consider the numerous essays ofeach ofthese (where Unamuno 's writings on cientificismomight have been of interest in the light of the earlier writings on Darwinism and 'Darwinisticism'), Pratt approaches the topic here via the aesthetics of tragedy and sublimity. Finally, in the discussion of Ortega and his views on the place ofscience in modern culture, we return almost fullcircle. Ortega is argued to be unfailingly modern in his interest in science, and in his ability to write on it, but also unfailingly critical and cautious in thinking of the place of science in culture. Two notes characterize Signs of Science. One is an awareness of the levels and complexities of enthusiasm for science in Spanish, despite the much-famed backwardness that was the despair of the generation of '98, coupled with a sensitivity to other enthusiasms in Spain, notably the spiritual 'alternatives' to science. The other is the commitment of the author to his topic. Science and spirituality are dealt with even-handedly, with much objective comment (and necessarily some simplification, given the wide scope of the topic and the limits of length). If the author in the end draws back from sweeping conclusions, he has none the less opened up areas of inter? est and enquiry. Hispanic culture has clearly engaged in dialogue with science, albeit with many flawed representations of its themes and practitioners, and understanding all the inflections of this dialogue is central to our view of modern Spain. Clare College, Cambridge Alison Sinclair 'La Espana Moderna' and 'Regeneracion': A Cultural Review in Restoration Spain, i88g-igi4. By Rhian Davies. (Canada Blanch Monographs, 5) Manchester: Manchester Spanish and Portuguese Studies. 2000. xii + 212 pp. ?14.95. ISBN 0-953-99680-8. Do not pass by this study ofLa Espana Moderna believing it to be forspecialists only. Rhian Davies's book is an exemplary in-depth study ofa major review, but its signifi? cance derives frommore than that specific focus. The acquaintance with reviews ofthe 1016 Reviews early twentieth century that many Hispanists have is frequently confined to briefconsultation . Here they will findreason forgoing to look atjournals and reviews as pheno? mena in their own right,and not simply as vehicles forthe output of canonical...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it