MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380028494 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3027417/v1

Probabilistic Computing with NbOx Mott Memristor-based Self-oscillatory pbit

2023· preprint· en· W4380028494 on OpenAlexaff
Hakseung Rhee, Gwangmin Kim, Hanchan Song, Woojoon Park, Do Hoon Kim, Jae Hyun In, Kyung Kim Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersNational NanoFab CenterKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsMemristorProbabilistic logicComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Energy-based computing is a promising approach for solving NP-hard problems. Probabilistic computing using pbits, which can be fabricated through the semiconductor process and integrated with conventional processing units, can be an efficient candidate for fulfilling these demands. Here, we propose a novel pbit unit comprising a NbOx mott memristor-based oscillator, capable of generating probabilistic bits in a self-clocking manner. The noise-induced mott transition causes the probabilistic behavior, which can be effectively modeled using a multi-noise-induced stochastic process around the mott transition temperature. We demonstrate a memristive Boltzmann machine based on our proposed pbit and validate its feasibility by solving NP-hard problems. Furthermore, we propose a streamlined operation methodology that considers the autocorrelation of individual bits, enabling energy-efficient high-performance probabilistic computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207