Enabling robust environmental DNA assay design with “unikseq” for the identification of taxon‐specific regions within whole mitochondrial genomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing species monitoring in nature. At the heart of any eDNA approach is the reliance upon sufficient DNA sequence information to satisfy the demands of eDNA assay specificity and sensitivity. The most common source of this information has been restricted to short barcoding regions of the mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) and marker genes. The use of these limited regions for assay design has often resulted in substantial trade‐offs in assay performance. With increased accessibility of full mitogenome assemblies, the potential for designing more robust eDNA assays is considerably enhanced. However, this also poses a new challenge to effectively identify suitable regions for assay design using considerably larger sequences. We present unikseq, a utility that uses words of length k (k‐mers) to identify unique regions in a reference sequence relative to tolerated (ingroup) and not‐tolerated (outgroup or non‐target) sequence sets, quickly and with low memory that can yield highly specific assays. We illustrate its application within an assay development workflow through use‐case examples for the design and validation of four quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)‐based assays selective for American bullfrog (Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana), Burbot (Lota lota), Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), and Quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger). The chosen target species vary in range, habitat, and degree of relatedness to their sympatric species that, consequently, impact eDNA assay design difficulty. We demonstrate the effectiveness of unikseq through assay validation and characterization using DNA from voucher specimens, synthetic DNA, and, where possible, field samples, to verify the specificity and sensitivity of the newly designed assays. By facilitating whole mitogenome sequence comparison, the creation of high‐performing eDNA assays is substantially enhanced. Having several adjustable parameters for specifying user requirements within unikseq, this approach can facilitate the identification of suitable regions for a broad range of applications requiring nucleotide sequence comparisons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".