MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380081328 · doi:10.1002/edn3.438

Enabling robust environmental DNA assay design with “unikseq” for the identification of taxon‐specific regions within whole mitochondrial genomes

2023· article· en· W4380081328 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental DNA · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGenome British ColumbiaGenome Canada
KeywordsBiologyEnvironmental DNAMitochondrial DNADNA barcodingComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyGenomeGeneticsGeneEcologyBiodiversity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing species monitoring in nature. At the heart of any eDNA approach is the reliance upon sufficient DNA sequence information to satisfy the demands of eDNA assay specificity and sensitivity. The most common source of this information has been restricted to short barcoding regions of the mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) and marker genes. The use of these limited regions for assay design has often resulted in substantial trade‐offs in assay performance. With increased accessibility of full mitogenome assemblies, the potential for designing more robust eDNA assays is considerably enhanced. However, this also poses a new challenge to effectively identify suitable regions for assay design using considerably larger sequences. We present unikseq , a utility that uses words of length k ( k ‐mers) to identify unique regions in a reference sequence relative to tolerated (ingroup) and not‐tolerated (outgroup or non‐target) sequence sets, quickly and with low memory that can yield highly specific assays. We illustrate its application within an assay development workflow through use‐case examples for the design and validation of four quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)‐based assays selective for American bullfrog ( Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana ), Burbot ( Lota lota ), Lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ), and Quillback rockfish ( Sebastes maliger ). The chosen target species vary in range, habitat, and degree of relatedness to their sympatric species that, consequently, impact eDNA assay design difficulty. We demonstrate the effectiveness of unikseq through assay validation and characterization using DNA from voucher specimens, synthetic DNA, and, where possible, field samples, to verify the specificity and sensitivity of the newly designed assays. By facilitating whole mitogenome sequence comparison, the creation of high‐performing eDNA assays is substantially enhanced. Having several adjustable parameters for specifying user requirements within unikseq , this approach can facilitate the identification of suitable regions for a broad range of applications requiring nucleotide sequence comparisons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it