MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380362904 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2023.3285073

Joint Computation Offloading and Data Caching in Multi-Access Edge Computing Enabled Internet of Vehicles

2023· article· en· W4380362904 on OpenAlexaff
Liqing Liu, Xiaoming Yuan, Decheng Chen, Keping Yu, Amir Taherkordi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkTelecommunications linkInteger programmingThe InternetMobile edge computingEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionBase stationData transmissionServerDistributed computingSimulated annealingOperating systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Vehicles (IoV) has attracted global research interests across extensive applications. Due to the significant increase in the number of vehicles accessing the Internet, there are several challenges in designing efficient task offloading and data caching strategies to improve the utilization of the network resource and provide the users with high-quality services. To this end, this study proposes the task offloading and resource allocation schemes, including the selection of execution mode, data transmission path, the assignment of the sub-channels, the strategies of caching and caching updating in a Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC) enabled IoV system with multiple mobile vehicles equipped with the capacity of energy harvesting. Specifically, the downlink relevant data or the uplink offloaded data can be transmitted through either the Macro Base Station(MBS) or the Road Side Unit(RSU). Also, we consider two different situations: off-peak hours and peak hours, in which the execution mode is different. In off-peak hours, the tasks can directly offload to the MEC server, and the average execution delay minimization problem is modelled as an integer programming problem, which is solved by Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm (SAGA). In peak hours, the tasks can be either executed locally or offloaded to the MEC server, and the formulated problem are more complicated, which are solved by Deep Q Network (DQN). Finally, a series of simulations are conducted to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207