MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380369756 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad073.271

MDB-39. ASSESSMENT OF MEDULLOBLASTOMA PATIENTS THROUGH MONITORING EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES VIA SURFACE-ENHANCED RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY COMBINED WITH MACHINE LEARNING

2023· article· en· W4380369756 on OpenAlexaff
Carolina del Real Mata, Yao Lü, Mahsa Jalali, Laura Montermini, Marjan Khatami, Geoffroy Danieau, Ana Castillo Orozco, Janusz Rak, Livia Garzia, Sara Mahshid

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracellular vesiclesLiquid biopsyMedulloblastomaMachine learningComputer scienceRaman spectroscopyExtracellular vesicleArtificial intelligenceMedicineBioinformaticsBiomedical engineeringPathologyCancerChemistryInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

Abstract Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common brain pediatric tumor associated with considerable morbidity. While MB is treated with multimodal approaches, including surgery, the currently available technologies fail to provide non-invasive access for continuous assessment of disease progression and therapy efficacy. There is a need to develop monitoring systems for frequent use with minimum invasiveness that provides actionable information incorporating the heterogeneous nature of MB. Liquid biopsy is a non-invasive approach using circulating biomarkers, including nano-sized extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs are secreted by all cells, even cancerous ones. Molecular composition of cancer EVs contains fingerprints of their parental cell, reflective of salient features of the underlying disease. We used 54 pediatric plasma samples of MB patients to determine feasibility of assessing disease progression through EVs analysis. EVs were isolated from plasma using size exclusion chromatography prior to loading onto unique MoSERS chip. MoSERS platform contains nanostructured capture element for single EV detection capable of profiling liquid biopsy samples for surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. A total of 54 datasets were generated, each comprised of EV spectra collected with the MoSERS chip at a single EV resolution. A spectral library was integrated with the datasets of patients with confirmed MB diagnosis (n=34) and healthy controls (n=20), required to train and test a machine-learning implementation. The combination of MoSERS with robust machine learning algorithm provides a strong analysis and a simple interpretation of the patient’s health status. We optimized a pipeline for the data collection and analysis, demonstrating the feasibility of the MoSERS platform for pediatric cancer indication and need for less than 10 μl of sample to generate each unique dataset. Preliminary results demonstrate that MoSERS performance correlates with the results of clinical standards, providing a proof-of-concept for its implementation as a non-invasive and accessible alternative to monitor the health status of MB patients.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Conference abstract on monitoring medulloblastoma via Raman spectroscopy of extracellular vesicles; a clinical biomarker question.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

It develops a cancer-monitoring assay using extracellular vesicles and machine learning, not research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Biomedical liquid-biopsy diagnostic study of medulloblastoma, not metaresearch.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207