MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380591081 · doi:10.15407/srenergy2023.02.083

World experience in legal support for the use of consumers-regulators in power systems

2023· article· en· W4380591081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystem Research in Energy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Industrial Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyEnvironmental economicsBusinessNational powerLegislatureEnergy securityEnergy independenceElectric power systemNational securityComputer securityEconomicsPower (physics)EngineeringComputer scienceLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The positive experience of using various technologies in power systems as consumers-regulators for energy management is shown, which helps to increase the reliability and stability of power systems, and also reduces the need for new generating capacities, including expensive peak ones. The world experience of legal support for the use of consumers-regulators in power systems at the international, national, and regional levels is considered, namely: directives and regulations of the 4th European EU Energy Package; laws of the USA about independence and national security, energy efficiency improvements, research and development for grid modernization, and the results of the programs developed based on them; laws and regulations of the U.S.A. states and Canada to promote energy savings and reduce greenhouse gas emissions through increased use of renewable energy sources (RES) and other new technologies; the effectiveness of the system of measures DSM (Demand Side Management). In these documents, an important role is assigned to both the use of technologies such as RES, energy storage, Smart Grid, etc., and the possibility to combine consumers of different categories and the rules for their participation in the electricity market in a non-discriminatory way. An increase step by step in support for the use of consumers-regulators in power systems in the legislative and other national documents of Ukraine, in particular, in the new law on the development of energy storage installations, the National Action Plan for Renewable Energy for the period up to 2030, the National Transport Strategy of Ukraine for the period up to 2030, etc., which meet the main provisions of European directives, and it is also shown the need to take into account the wide introduction of new technologies such as Smart Grid, building consumption regulation, the use of electric vehicle charging stations, etc. Keywords: consumers-regulators, legal support, power system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it