MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380632830 · doi:10.3390/axioms12060585

Faber Polynomial Coefficient Estimates for Bi-Close-to-Convex Functions Defined by the q-Fractional Derivative

2023· article· en· W4380632830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsMathematicsConvex functionPolynomialRegular polygonUnit diskInvariant (physics)Fractional calculusPure mathematicsDerivative (finance)Operator (biology)CombinatoricsClass (philosophy)Mathematical analysisGeometryMathematical physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By utilizing the concept of the q-fractional derivative operator and bi-close-to-convex functions, we define a new subclass of A, where the class A contains normalized analytic functions in the open unit disk E and is invariant or symmetric under rotation. First, using the Faber polynomial expansion (FPE) technique, we determine the lth coefficient bound for the functions contained within this class. We provide a further explanation for the first few coefficients of bi-close-to-convex functions defined by the q-fractional derivative. We also emphasize upon a few well-known outcomes of the major findings in this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it