An Evangelistic Approach to Children of the Brantford Seventh-day Adventist Church in Brantford, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem Over the past five years (2015-2020) the Brantford Seventh-day Adventist Church has experienced a decline of baptism among young people ages 10-14. Some of them have been involved in church programs, and some have attended the local Christian school. According to Barna (2003a), children are more ready to accept Jesus at ages 10-14. At Brantford Seventh-day Adventist Church, this is the average range of the children. This church has more than 80 families and more than twenty-five children at that age group. After many of them leave for high school, they lose interest in baptism and in following Jesus. Method With the help of my adviser and church leaders, a six-week seminar was conducted to address the situation. The seminars were intended to provide a biblical view on parenting and to educate the parents on how to guide their children to accept Jesus. These seminars were held in the local church on Sabbath afternoons. Parents were asked to fill out questionnaires before and after the seminars. This provided an understanding of the relationships that parents have to the unbaptized youth, age 10-16. Results Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the seminars were not so well attended but the six parents who attended gained valuable information. Parents shared their experiences and their practices of raising their children and understood more clearly their responsibility, God’s call for them, and an improved biblical foundation of parenting. The parents of Brantford church, who participated in this study understood that the church is a place of spiritual guidance, and so is the school, but the home is the primary place where the children receive spiritual nurture, guidance, and leadership for their spiritual lives. They were convinced that family worship, church attendance, and quality time with their children, were crucial to their gradual conversion and decision for baptism. Conclusion All of the parents who attended the seminar completely agreed with the content of the presentations and were willing to implement them in their families, and the leaders were fully supportive. The concern I had before the seminars that parents would not accept the content very willingly seemed to have vanished during the seminars. Most importantly they were equipped with the materials that they needed for raising their children. These seminars can be modified and used to further nurture the congregation, and as outreach in the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.038 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".