Towards improved understanding of naval ship structural performance via virtual hull monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weight-optimised ships, such as High Speed Light Craft (HSLC), are operated by navies around the world. Naval ships must perform in harsh and contested ocean environments. Operations in high sea states result in large linear and nonlinear ship motions which in turn, induce significant loads on ship structures and accelerate structural fatigue. Monitoring and assessment of fatigue on ship structures is important for navies, to understand the performance, limitations, and life-cycle costs of their ships. An established method for monitoring structural responses is via long-term measurements, using Instrumented Hull Monitoring (IHM). However, this approach is generally too resource-intensive to be implemented on a broad scale. Virtual Hull Monitoring (VHM) is a technique to couple on-board ship data, such as Global Positioning System (GPS) data, with hindcast wave data. The resulting enriched dataset enables robust numerical fatigue analysis, because the structural responses are related to the encountered wave environment, rather than based on global wave statistics. Thus, the concept of VHM is receiving increased attention in both commercial and military sectors. This is due to its low cost and the relative ease of implementation compared to IHM. Using a Royal Australian Navy HSLC as the test bed, this study presents an investigation into the feasibility of VHM by comparing results with available IHM data. An efficient framework was developed in PythonTM to extract and couple hindcast wave data to ship speed and position, calculating the resultant stresses on the ship structure, and comparing with the measured stresses from IHM. The novel aspects of this work include the use of a semi-displacement hullform, and the utilisation of both sea-trials and long-term measurements. The study shows promising results for VHM. Finally, recommendations for further work are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".