MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380996230 · doi:10.3390/s23125581

Scheduling Sparse LEO Satellite Transmissions for Remote Water Level Monitoring

2023· article· en· W4380996230 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSatelliteComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)ConstellationLow earth orbitReal-time computingSatellite constellationEnergy consumptionCommunications satelliteWirelessWireless sensor networkRemote sensingComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineeringAerospace engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the use of low earth orbit (LEO) satellite links in long-term monitoring of water levels across remote areas. Emerging sparse LEO satellite constellations maintain sporadic connection to the ground station, and transmissions need to be scheduled for satellite overfly periods. For remote sensing, the energy consumption optimization is critical, and we develop a learning approach for scheduling the transmission times from the sensors. Our online learning-based approach combines Monte Carlo and modified k-armed bandit approaches, to produce an inexpensive scheme that is applicable to scheduling any LEO satellite transmissions. We demonstrate its ability to adapt in three common scenarios, to save the transmission energy 20-fold, and provide the means to explore the parameters. The presented study is applicable to wide range of IoT applications in areas with no existing wireless coverages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it