Influence of the vestibular system on the neonatal motor behaviors in the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marsupials are born very immature yet must be sufficiently autonomous to crawl on the mother's belly, find a teat and attach to it to pursue their development. Sensory inputs are necessary to guide the newborn to a teat and induce attachment. The vestibular system, which perceives gravity and head movements, is one of the senses proposed to guide newborns towards the teats but there are conflicting observations about its functionality at birth (postnatal day (P) 0). To test if the vestibular system of opossum newborns is functional and can influence locomotion, we used two approaches. First, we stimulated the vestibular apparatus in in vitro preparations from opossums aged from P1 to P12 and recorded motor responses: at all ages studied, mechanical pressures applied on the vestibular organs induced spinal roots activity whereas head tilts did not induce forelimb muscle contractions. Second, using immunofluorescence, we assessed the presence of Piezo2, a protein involved in mechanotransduction in vestibular hair cells. Piezo2 labeling was scant in the utricular macula at birth, but observed in all vestibular organs at P7, its intensity increasing up to P14; it seemed to stay the same at P21. Our results indicate that neural pathways from the labyrinth to the spinal cord are already in place around birth but that the vestibular organs are too immature to influence motor activity before the end of the second postnatal week in the opossum. It may be the rule in marsupial species that the vestibular system becomes functional only after birth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".