MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381161963 · doi:10.1016/s2666-5247(23)00106-4

Paenibacillus spp infection among infants with postinfectious hydrocephalus in Uganda: an observational case-control study

2023· article· en· W4381161963 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah U. Morton, Christine Hehnly, Kathy Burgoine, Paddy Ssentongo, Jessica E. Ericson, M. S. Binoj Kumar, Cornelia Hagmann, Claudio Fronterrè, Jasmine Smith, Mercedeh Movassagh, Nicholas Streck, Lisa M. Bebell, Joel Bazira, Elias Kumbakumba, Francis Bajunirwe, Ronald Mulondo, Edith Mbabazi-Kabachelor, Davis Natukwatsa, Esther Nalule, Joshua Magombe, Tim Erickson, Joseph Ngonzi, Moses Ochora, Peter Olupot‐Olupot, Justin Onen, Peter Ssenyonga, John Mugamba, Benjamin C. Warf, Abhaya V. Kulkarni, Jessica Lane, Andrew J. Whalen, Lijun Zhang, Kathryn Sheldon, Frederick A. Meier, Julius Kiwanuka, James R. Broach, Joseph N. Paulson, Steven J. Schiff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Microbe · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentMedical Research CouncilGenentechNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHydrocephalusPaenibacillusSepsisMedicineMeningitisNeonatal sepsisCohortCohort studyCord bloodPediatricsObstetricsInternal medicineBiologySurgeryBacteria16S ribosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus is a cause of postinfectious hydrocephalus among Ugandan infants. To determine whether Paenibacillus spp is a pathogen in neonatal sepsis, meningitis, and postinfectious hydrocephalus, we aimed to complete three separate studies of Ugandan infants. The first study was on peripartum prevalence of Paenibacillus in mother-newborn pairs. The second study assessed Paenibacillus in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from neonates with sepsis. The third study assessed Paenibacillus in CSF from infants with hydrocephalus. METHODS: In this observational study, we recruited mother-newborn pairs with and without maternal fever (mother-newborn cohort), neonates (aged ≤28 days) with sepsis (sepsis cohort), and infants (aged ≤90 days) with hydrocephalus with and without a history of neonatal sepsis and meningitis (hydrocephalus cohort) from three hospitals in Uganda between Jan 13, 2016 and Oct 2, 2019. We collected maternal blood, vaginal swabs, and placental samples and the cord from the mother-newborn pairs, and blood and CSF from neonates and infants. Bacterial content of infant CSF was characterised by 16S rDNA sequencing. We analysed all samples using quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting either the Paenibacillus genus or Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus spp. We collected cranial ultrasound and computed tomography images in the subset of participants represented in more than one cohort. FINDINGS: No Paenibacillus spp were detected in vaginal, maternal blood, placental, or cord blood specimens from the mother-newborn cohort by qPCR. Paenibacillus spp was detected in 6% (37 of 631 neonates) in the sepsis cohort and, of these, 14% (5 of 37 neonates) developed postinfectious hydrocephalus. Paenibacillus was the most enriched bacterial genera in postinfectious hydrocephalus CSF (91 [44%] of 209 patients) from the hydrocephalus cohort, with 16S showing 94% accuracy when validated by qPCR. Imaging showed progression from Paenibacillus spp-related meningitis to postinfectious hydrocephalus over 1-3 months. Patients with postinfectious hydrocephalus with Paenibacillus spp infections were geographically clustered. INTERPRETATION: Paenibacillus spp causes neonatal sepsis and meningitis in Uganda and is the dominant cause of subsequent postinfectious hydrocephalus. There was no evidence of transplacental transmission, and geographical evidence was consistent with an environmental source of neonatal infection. Further work is needed to identify routes of infection and optimise treatment of neonatal Paenibacillus spp infection to lessen the burden of morbidity and mortality. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and Boston Children's Hospital Office of Faculty Development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet MicrobeSame topicYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchFrench-language works237,207