MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381542792 · doi:10.2478/cait-2023-0004

Competent Time Synchronization Mac Protocols to Attain High Performance of Wireless Sensor Networks for Secure Communication

2023· article· en· W4381542792 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ismail Hababeh, Issa Khalil, Rizik Al-Sayyed, Mahmoud Moshref, Samer Nofal, Ali Rodan

Bibliographic record

VenueCybernetics and Information Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondation Pour La Conservation Du Saumon Atlantique
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless sensor networkClock synchronizationSynchronization (alternating current)Computer networkClock driftReliability (semiconductor)WirelessKey distribution in wireless sensor networksData synchronizationWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)Real-time computingDistributed computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clock synchronization in the Mac layer plays a vital role in wireless sensor network communication that maintains time-based channel sharing and offers a uniform timeframe among different network nodes. Most wireless sensor networks are distributed where no common clock exists among them. Therefore, joint actions are realized by exchanging messages, with time stamps using local sensor clocks. These clocks can easily drift seconds and cause functional problems to the applications that depend on time synchronization. Time synchronization is a major and challenging factor in wireless sensor networks that needs to be studied and explored. In this paper, we propose integrated time synchronization protocols that serve wireless sensor network applications under normal, secured, and unreliable environments. The proposed protocols are discussed and evaluated based on their accuracy, cost, hierarchy, reliability, and security. Simulation results show that the proposed time synchronization protocols outperform the state-of-the-art techniques in achieving a minimum synchronization time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCybernetics and Information TechnologiesSame topicNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207