MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381663308 · doi:10.1002/ndr2.12188

First report of High Plains wheat mosaic virus in Iran

2023· article· en· W4381663308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIsfahan University of Technology
KeywordsPanicum miliaceumBiologyPlant virusHordeum vulgareAvenaVirusSanger sequencingPotyviridaeTriticaleVirologyBotanyGenePoaceaeGeneticsPotyvirusDNA sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Plains wheat mosaic virus (HPWMoV, genus Emaravirus) has an octopartite, negative-sense RNA genome, each segment encoding a single open reading frame. The virus is transmitted by the wheat curl mite (Aceria tosichella) (Tatineni et al., 2014). HPWMoV has been reported from Argentina, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Ukraine and the USA (Abdullahi et al., 2020; Snihur et al., 2020). Mixed infections of HPWMoV and Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV, genus Tritimovirus) often occur in the field and lead to severe symptoms (Byamukama et al., 2016). In 2021 and 2022, 85 leaf samples were collected from different gramineous plants with chlorotic leaf streak symptoms (Figure 1) in the Isfahan and Chaharmahal-o-Bakhtiari provinces, central Iran. Total RNA was extracted using the CTAB method and RT-PCR was performed using the specific HPWMoV primers HPV-F1 and HPV-R1 targeting part of the nucleocapsid protein gene (Lebas et al., 2005), and WSMV-specific primers WSMVF and WSMVR amplifying the coat protein gene (Mar et al., 2013). The expected fragments (339 and 948 bp, respectively) were amplified, Sanger-sequenced directly and confirmed as HPWMoV and WSMV, respectively, by nucleotide sequence comparisons. The results revealed HPWMoV in single or mixed infection with WSMV in wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgare), corn (Zea mays), oat (Avena sativa), millet (Panicum miliaceum) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Eighty percent of the collected samples were infected with at least one virus. Mixed and single infections of HPWMoV and WSMV were determined in 41, 37 and 22% of samples, respectively. Sequence analysis of an Iranian HPWMoV isolate from wheat (GenBank Accession No. OQ214884) showed the highest identity (97%) to a corn isolate from Ohio (KT988872.1) and a barley isolate from Kansas (KT988863.1), and the lowest identity (87%) to a wheat isolate from Ohio (KT970501.1). However, an Iranian HPWMoV isolate from barley (OQ214885) had 92% identity to a wheat isolate from Ohio (KT988882.1). In a transmission test, wheat curl mite nymphs reared on wheat were allowed to feed on HPWMoV-infected wheat for 24 hours of acquisition access feeding. The nymphs were then transferred to thirty seedlings at the two-leaf stage, twenty nymphs per plant, for 24 hours of transmission feeding. All test plants showed mosaic symptoms four to six days post inoculation. Infection of the test plants was confirmed by RT-PCR as described above. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of HPWMoV in Iran. WSMV is widely distributed in most wheat-producing regions in Iran (Masumi et al., 2006). However, our results suggest that HPWMoV is more common than WSMV in the central parts of Iran and probably in other regions too and should be considered as a new agent in the epidemiology of mite-borne viruses infecting cereals in Iran. The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Isfahan University of Technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it