MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Deep Learning Approach for Root Cause Analysis in Real-Time IIoT Edge Networks

2023· article· en· W4381744889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRoot cause analysisDeep learningRoot causeAnomaly detectionArtificial intelligenceNode (physics)Latency (audio)Data miningEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge computingMachine learningEngineeringReliability engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications is usually associated with stringent latency requirements. An anomaly in an IIoT edge network deteriorates the performance and thus needs a real-time Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to identify the anomalous node and provide robust network infrastructure. In this paper, we present an automated, real-time RCA technique to identify the network-level root cause nodes. We use a deep learning-based approach, exploiting a Graph Neural Network (GNN) to identify root cause nodes. In GNN-RCA, we used a sampling technique and optimized aggregator function to reduce detection time. We have shown that the proposed GNNRCA method outperforms the existing benchmarks in terms of classification score and execution time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it