Federated Learning With Dynamic Epoch Adjustment and Collaborative Training in Mobile Edge Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a distributed learning paradigm, federated learning (FL) can be applied in mobile edge computing (MEC) to support real-time artificial intelligence by leveraging edge computation resources while preserving data privacy in the end devices. However, the unpredictable wireless connections between end devices and edge servers in MEC (e.g., frequent handovers and unstable wireless channels) may result in the loss of important model parameters, which slows down the FL training process and degrades the quality of the global model. In this paper, we propose an adaptive collaborative federated learning (ACFL) scheme to accelerate the convergence and improve model reliability by mitigating communication-based parameter loss under a three-layer MEC architecture. First, a dynamic epoch adjustment method is proposed to reduce communication rounds by dynamically adjusting the training epochs in end devices. In addition, to accelerate the FL convergence, we present an edge server collaborative training scheme by leveraging a multi-layer computing architecture, where edge servers utilize their maintained data to collaboratively train models with end devices. Finally, extensive simulations are conducted and show that ACFL can efficiently improve model reliability and accelerate the convergence of the FL process in MEC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".