MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381785946 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2023.3288234

Robust Downlink Transmission Design in IRS-Assisted Cognitive Satellite and Terrestrial Networks

2023· article· en· W4381785946 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
KeywordsComputer scienceTelecommunications linkTransmitter power outputBeamformingOptimization problemComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)TelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive satellite and terrestrial network (CSTN) is considered as a promising technology to provide ubiquitous connectivity for various users within wide-coverage. This paper proposes a robust downlink transmission scheme for multiple intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRSs) assisted CSTN. Here, the satellite network adopts multigroup multicast transmission scheme to serve many earth stations, while the terrestrial network exploits space division multiple access and multi-IRS-enhanced non-orthogonal multiple access technology to communicate with many terrestrial users. By assuming that these two networks share the same frequency band having only the angular information based imperfect channel state information of each user, we formulate an optimization problem to minimize the total transmit power subject to the constraints of quality-of-service requirement for each user, per-antenna transmit power budgets of satellite and BS, and unit-modulus requirement for each reflecting element. To tackle this mathematically intractable problem, we then employ angular discretization together with the successive convex approximation method to obtain the active beamforming (BF) vectors of satellite and BS, the passive BF vector of IRS, and the power allocation coefficients. Moreover, we propose a generalized zero forcing BF and alternative optimization to obtain the suboptimal solutions of the optimization problem with low computational complexity. Finally, simulation results are given to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed two schemes over the benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it