MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381800917 · doi:10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-7301

Investigating Changes in Ride-Sourcing Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Two-Cycle Survey of the Greater Toronto Area

2023· article· en· W4381800917 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Loa, Yicong Liu, Felita Ong, Sanjana Hossain, Khandker Nurul Habib

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Survey researchGeographyVirologyMedicinePsychologyApplied psychologyOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has resulted in changes in modal preferences, leading to an increased preference for individual modes (e.g., private vehicles and active modes) and a reduced preference for shared modes. However, ride-sourcing represents somewhat of a middle ground between individual and shared modes, given the relatively limited number of interactions with strangers. Consequently, these services have the potential to serve as an alternative to public transit, particularly for those without a private vehicle. Given the extent to which ride-sourcing impacted transportation systems prior to the pandemic, as well as the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on modal preferences, it is essential to understand the short- and long-term impacts of the pandemic on ride-sourcing use. The goal of this paper is to examine how ride-sourcing use, attitudes toward ride-sourcing services, and the anticipated use of ride-sourcing in the postpandemic period have changed over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. The data for this study were obtained through a two-cycle survey conducted using a web-based interface in the Greater Toronto Area. The results suggest that ride-sourcing use and attitudes toward ride-sourcing services have rebounded from the initial impacts of the pandemic and that these services could be acting as an alternative to public transit. Additionally, the results highlight how changes in the utilization of ride-sourcing over the course of the pandemic can vary based on factors such as age, household income, and household vehicle ownership. The findings presented in this study can be used to help identify trends in ride-sourcing use that should be monitored both during and after the pandemic. This information can assist in the development of future data collection programs that can inform policies that aim to address the negative externalities of ride-sourcing services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A SystemsSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207