MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382541492 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100345

On the Third Hankel Determinant of Certain Subclass of Bi-Univalent Functions

2023· article· en· W4382541492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubclassMathematicsPure mathematicsCombinatoricsMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we introduce a novel subclass of bi-univalent functions, which are of considerable interest in various fields of mathematics, including complex analysis and geometric function theory.By employing the property of subordination, we define these bi-univalent functions as ℛ(, , ) and impose constraints on the coefficients | |.Our investigation provides the upper bounds for the bi-univalent functions in this newly developed subclass, specifically for n=2, 3, 4, and 5.We then derive the third Hankel determinant for this particular class, which reveals several intriguing scenarios.These findings contribute to the broader understanding of bi-univalent functions and their potential applications in diverse mathematical contexts.Notably, the results obtained may serve as a foundation for future investigations into the properties and applications of bi-univalent functions and their subclasses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it