MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382791294 · doi:10.5114/ms.2023.129035

Coagulation abnormalities as predictors of renal dysfunction in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2023· article· en· W4382791294 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEjection fractionHeart failureInternal medicineMedicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Heart failure (HF) is a prothrombotic state that is also associated with the progression of renal dysfunction. However, it is unknown whether coagulation abnormalities are associated with progressive cardiorenal syndrome. Aim of the research To evaluate activators and inhibitors of coagulation and fibrinolysis and their relationship with renal failure in HF patients. Material and methods Coagulation biomarkers such as thrombin-antithrombin III, human tissue-type plasminogen activator, human plasminogen activator inhibitor, von Willebrand factor (vWF), soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), human prothrombin fragments (F1+F2), and protein C were evaluated in 36 consecutive HF patients without anticoagulation and in 19 controls matched in age and gender. Results HF patients, compared to controls, had lower levels of C protein (p = 0.04) and F1 + F2 (p < 0.001) but higher levels of vWF (p < 0.001) and borderline sTM (p = 0.07). Similarly, haemoglobin (p < 0.001) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p = 0.004) were lower in HF, while INR (p < 0.001), NT-proBNP (p < 0.001), and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) (p < 0.001) were higher. Most of the echocardiographic parameters differed between the 2 groups. From coagulation biomarkers, sTM (r = –0.66; p < 0.001) and vWF (r = –0.41; p = 0.002) were associated with eGFR. Most of the echocardiographic and laboratory parameters were also related to eGFR. After classifying all variables into 5 categories; laboratory tests, echocardiographic parameters, vascular reactivity, haemodynamics, and coagulation parameters, multivariable linear regression showed that coagulation parameters were the most strongly associated with eGFR (r2 = 0.48, p < 0.001). Conclusions In the study population, coagulation disorders were most strongly associated with impaired renal function, independently of other parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it