MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382792671 · doi:10.5430/jbar.v12n2p9

Leadership and Digital Transformation

2023· article· en· W4382792671 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elaine Maria de Moura Souza, Pedro Araújo Pietrafesa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business Administration Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigitizationDigital transformationPillarFace (sociological concept)Industrial RevolutionDigital RevolutionSubject (documents)Perspective (graphical)Transformation (genetics)SociologyWork (physics)Knowledge managementPublic relationsPolitical scienceBusinessComputer scienceEngineeringSocial scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work highlights the concepts and theories related to leadership from the perspective of digital transformation. Digital transformation, which is also known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution, requires private and public organizations to adapt management models to enable their evolution and face challenges to remain competitive and survive in the market. Therefore, leadership is necessary for such a revolution. Traditional theorists were consulted about the subject of leadership and modern sources of digitization, resulting in avant-garde and contemporary content. Innovation is a vital attribute for companies that allows them to remain viable, healthy, and sustainable, and leadership is an essential pillar that supports this.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.292
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.044 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Business Administration ResearchSame topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207