MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Women, Preachers, Methodists: Papers from Two Conferences Held in 2019, the 350th Anniversary of Susanna Wesley’s Birth

2023· article· en· W4383378431 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jennifer Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMormonism, Religion, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethodismWelshCompendiumValue (mathematics)ClassicsHistorySociologyTheologyPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many monographs and even publications of conference papers (as this is) are out of reach for anyone other than specialists or libraries because of high cost: it may seem an odd place to start a review, but this collection is exceedingly good value for a balanced, lively, accessible, and nonetheless academically rigorous offering. This volume is an edited compendium of papers (and in one case, a paper submitted but not offered) from two conferences in 2019 commemorating the 350th anniversary of Susanna Wesley’s birth in 1669. The four essays in part one of the book, ‘Susanna Wesley; “a bright succession”’, reflect critically on aspects of Susanna Wesley’s life and legacy, including her marriage, her approach and attitude to female education, and her influence on her son John. These were offered at the first of the two conferences, in July 2019. The contributions in parts two and three of the book were largely offered at the second, November 2019 conference held in Oxford, ‘“An Extraordinary Call”: Methodist Women Preachers in Britain 1740 to the Present’. The papers in part two balance several historical snapshots of individual women with studies of women as preachers in Primitive Methodism and among the Bible Christians, and in Welsh Methodism. Part three of the book has three overlapping personal reflections from the first and second generation of Methodist women ordained since it became possible in 1974.Appropriate for a wide array of readers, the book offers the chance to eavesdrop as professional and lay historians as well as practitioners reflect on how to understand the stories of women in Methodism. In a contemporary church setting where the journey to gender quality is not complete, it is salutary to remember how recent women’s ordination is in the life of the British Methodist Church. There is a subtext in this volume of advocacy for women’s ministry in church leadership and specifically as preachers writ through the variety of essays, coalescing in the personal reflections of first- and second-generation ordained women in the final section. This means that a reader needs as much awareness of the authors as the substance of the text to get the most from this collection. The short author notes at the beginning are a good starting place, but an interested reader would be well advised to spend time learning more about where the authors sit in Methodism to understand the background of their chapters.Though all the contributors consider the preaching ministry specifically, there is much overlap with reflection about women’s leadership in more general terms and also with questions about the creative tension between ordained and lay ministry in British Methodism. This means that the book contains an implicit thread of comment beyond the focus on women, exploring the thinking and development of Methodist theologies of ordination and corporate oversight more generally.It would have been a helpful addition to include an editors’ conclusion (in addition to the useful introduction) to allow the earlier historical papers to respond to the later personal reflections, and perhaps draw out the question of how women’s ordination has impacted Methodist understandings of ordained ministry and the ministry of preachers per se since 1974. However, noting the lack of editors’ conclusion is less notice of an omission and more endorsement of the success of the collection in drawing the reader into an ongoing, unfinished conversation. This collection begs British Methodism for more research (some of which is ongoing) about the cause and context of continuing gender inequality in higher leadership in British Methodism alluded to in Reverend Michaela Youngson’s final essay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.012
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0210.006
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesley and Methodist StudiesSame topicMormonism, Religion, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207